This is E- News Afrika, we are for real. Join us to get the latest news.
Thank you for inviting me to join you as we celebrate
the life and times of a great African – Professor Ali Al’Amin Mazrui (24
February 1933 – 12 October 2014), my friend of long-standing with whom I
shared common views on the historical roots and future of the African
continent.
When I heard about his passing on October 21 last year, I felt deeply
grieved about losing a friend and about Africa having lost one of its
scholarly giants and believers in a truly great continent. His books and
his hundreds of scholarly articles explored topics relating to African
politics, international political culture, political Islam and
globalisation. It is not my intention in this address to chronicle his
expansive biography which I am sure you will get from the numerous
writings and eulogies which adorn several internet sites, but to reflect
with you on the life of a great friend and true son of Africa within
the context of the work that you do in the Ethiopian Academy of
Sciences.
Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen, I remember Ali Mazrui for at
least three things. First, he was immensely soaked in the history of
Africa and could extrapolate the future growth and development of the
region with uncanny accuracy and positivism. Taking a long walk down in
history,
late Mazrui was one of the champions of the full unification of the
peoples of Africa and of the transformation of the conditions of the
peoples of Africa under the Pan African Movement. He was an embodiment
of courage and humanism. By humanism, I mean his philosophical and
ethical stance whenever he emphasized the value and agency of human
beings whether individually or collectively. To him, race, religion,
region, sexuality or gender did not matter. Rather justice, peace,
self-determination, the rights of women, secularism and prosperity for
all are always just causes worth fighting for.
Second, he was down-to-earth and not a lover of material things,
freeing his mind for wider exploration of things which affect humanity,
especially his African ancestry. When he died, I was not surprised to
learn that he had no house of his own in his hometown of Mombasa.
Further indexing his core value of simplicity is his settling for a very
simple burial, not in the US where he died but back in his village
family cemetery. The third thing I remember Professor Ali Mazrui for is
being a prominent critic of the current world order, taking it to be
deeply exploitative of Africa which was reflected in the television
series he created: The Africans: A Triple Heritage, which was jointly
produced by the BBC and the Public Broadcasting Service (WETA,
Washington) in association with the Nigerian Television Authority. The
intellectual finesse of Ali Mazrui, the versatility of his thinking and
his grandeur approach to presenting the African continent to the rest of
the world will forever remain an exemplary legacy for all.
Since my friend, Ali Mazrui, was a Fellow of the African Academy of
Sciences and we are celebrating him at the Ethiopian Academy of
Sciences, I have decided to reflect with you today on “The African
Scientist in a Fast-Changing World”.
Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen, we are living in a world that is
changing at a fast pace with push from the mighty hands of science and
technology. The imprimatur of science keeps being etched deeply into the
fabrics of human development. From agriculture, through medicine to
space exploration, science along with its associates – technology and
engineering -, is transforming our societies for good and with some
collateral ills. Science is already moving to enlarge its influence in
the interdisciplinary, international, and in intercultural areas. It is
the most powerful means we have for the unification of knowledge, and a
main obligation of its future must be to deal with problems which cut
across boundaries, whether boundaries between the sciences, boundaries
between nations, or boundaries between man’s scientific and his humane
concerns.
Over the last twelve months, some notable advances in science include
development of autonomous (driverless) cars, 3D printing,
nanotechnology in medicine and engineering, e-textiles, digital scent
technology, immersive virtual reality, artificial photosynthesis,
zero-energy building, vortex engines, 5G cellular communication,
cryptocurrency, antimatter weaponry and nextgen stealth technology.
We are also inching closer to getting a malaria vaccine. We have just
got WHO approval for a fifteen-minute test to confirm ebola instead of
hours for laboratory analysis.
During the last two weeks, the fast-paced world of science and
technology reported the British government voting to allow a new
technique involving babies created from three people. If passed by the
House of Lords, the UK will become the first country in the world to
offer this medical procedure, which can be used to treat mitochondrial
diseases.
Other exciting things in the world of science in the last two weeks
include use of biodegradable nanoparticles to kill brain cancer cells in
animals and lengthen their survival and the selection of 100 astronaut
candidates for the Mars One project which will land four people on Mars.
New drugs to counter diabetes and hypertension ravaging Africa and
the rest of the world are in different stages of development. The
technology in surgery has also advanced in recent months. Consider
surgery when a patient is to get his or her diseased heart, liver or
spleen removed with minimal invasion through new technologies being
developed by biomedical engineers in the University of London and at
Harvard.
By 2050, the scenario that surgeons envisage is one where a patient
with an organ failure walks into a hospital, gets a 3-D printed organ to
replace it in a few hours. It may be twenty years or more before these
drugs and surgical techniques become available for the masses. However,
when they do, the health of the people will be better secured than what
we have today.
Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen, when we aggregate the efforts of
the global community of scientists through the ages, the African
scientist has not been a complete pushover. You will recall that some of
the well-known contributions of ancient African science include one of
the first intensive agricultural schemes; metallurgy, including the
mining and smelting of copper, practised in Africa as far back as 4000
B.C.; and the system of hieroglyphic writing and the use of papyrus. The
science of architecture also reached new heights with the pyramids.
They were amazing accomplishments both in terms of construction and the
mathematical and astronomical knowledge necessary to build and situate
them.
Sadly today, the place of eminence of the African scientist on the
global horizon is fast regressing. In a fast-changing world, we are
getting far left behind. Our contribution to the science, technology and
engineering scholarly literature is the least of all regions of the
world. Our universities are at the bottom of global league tables of
world-class universities with the region having the least number of
Nobel Prize winners in science. Even, a good number of our local
problems are being solved by scientists from outside our region. Yet, we
have some of the best intellectually-endowed scientists in the world.
The laboratories in Asia, Europe and North America, where breakthroughs
are achieved to drive our fast-changing world, are populated in part by
brain-drained African scientists.
As Ali Mazrui would have inquired, where lies the problem? In my
view, the problem causing African scientists to underperform in a
fast-changing world has at least four sides to it. There is a severe
under-investment of African governments and African private sector in
science and technology infrastructure. When such investment is
disaggregated by region, North America has the highest while Africa has
the least. In 2010, regional averages of the percentage of GDP devoted
to research and development activities in science, technology and
innovation are: 2.7% for North America; 0.7% for Latin America and the
Caribbean; 1.8% for Europe; 0.4% for Africa; 1.6% for Asia; and 2.2% for
Oceania.
In 2012, the distribution of researchers per 1 million inhabitants
shows Africa being the least served. The data are expressed in full-time
equivalents (FTE), which are a measure of the actual volume of human
resources devoted to research and development (R&D). This is surely a
backlash from the low investment in the sector. This low level of
investment translates to poor research laboratories, inconsequential
grants to support meaningful and context-relevant research and
unattractive welfare scheme to retain top-quality scientists.
The second dimension to the problem is the depreciating research
skills of the young, up-and-coming generation of scientists. Today,
many research institutes and universities in Africa are increasingly
populated by poorer-quality scholars relative to what we had in the mid
to the closing decades of the 20th century. I am sure members of the
Ethiopian Academy of Sciences who are familiar with the trend in your
flagship university – Addis Ababa University – and others will find
empirical support for this observation.
The third is a consternation of socio-cultural distractions of the
African scientist pulling him or her away from the serious business of
sciencing. The typical scientist has a retinue of family (nuclear and
extended) and friends that look up to him or her for financial and other
forms of support induced by poverty which pervades the land. A land
where there is scant social security to take care of the aged,
unemployed and others needing state support. Many African countries
suffer this lack of social security and high-level of poverty scourge.
After servicing some of the needs of these dependants, the scientist has
little or nothing left and far from achieving Maslow’s self-esteem to
be able to concentrate to conduct first-grade science experiments. Let
us take the case of the full professor of science in Addis Ababa
University earning about US$800 a month (approximately 16,000 Birr).
After servicing some of the major needs of his nuclear and extended
family, he has barely US$20 left. His urgent monthly preoccupation will
be to run around looking for augmentation. Laboratory work and how to
use his scientific training to solve urgent societal problems will be
low down on the priority list. I am giving the example of Ethiopia only
because I am speaking at this event organised by the Ethiopian Academy
of Sciences. The scenario I just painted is pervasive in many African
countries.
The fourth factor is the shrinking level of adventurism by the
African scientist. Unlike the European and North American counterparts,
the African scientist would appear increasingly weak in the quest to
conquer the world; to explore; and to venture into novel grounds. While
there are pockets of praiseworthy efforts in this direction, such
efforts are still too little. Of over 215,500 new grounds broken in
science and technology in 2014, a mere 0.01% are associated in some form
with African scientists. Ali Mazrui, who we are celebrating today,
stopped short of calling it “intellectual timidity” in the 2002 book
“Africa and other Civilizations: Conquest and Counter-Conquest, The
Collected Essays of Ali A. Mazrui, Vol 2”. While this may be explained
by the interplay of several factors such as poor working conditions, we
cannot discount the significant impact of the spirit of adventure of the
scientist.
Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen, I am not here to overly bemoan
the past but to share with you what we must urgently do to salvage the
situation; what we must do to ensure that African scientists stand up to
be counted in the march to improve human civilisation in the 21st
century and beyond through science and technology.
There is the need to significantly increase investment in science,
technology and innovation to a level which is at least 15% higher than
current values and progressively increase by 5% every year for the next
20 years. Implementation of this investment, without allowing corruption
to creep into the equation, will translate to improvement in the
quality of laboratories for research. We need to set research agenda
that is relevant to contemporary and future needs of African nations and
the region as a whole and monitor the implementation of this agenda. We
need to install a sustainable maintenance culture for the facilities
and equipment that will result from the improved investment. Centres of
excellence at the national, sub-regional and regional levels which are
emerging as vogue, should not just be a flash in the pan but be
sustained over time and expanded in coverage.
On the welfare front, African nations need to encourage their
scientists with improved welfare scheme that is attractive enough to
reverse brain drain. You can have the best laboratories, glittering with
the latest technology but without well-motivated scientists, no
meaningful and productive practice of science can result. Continuous
professional development of scientists in the use of latest
technologies, processes and products should also be given top priority.
Paying greater attention to improved delivery of science at the
secondary level, will guarantee the development of a corpus of young
scientists with the spirit of adventurism which would appear waning in
the older generation.
Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen, if there are seven things I
imagine Ali Mazrui would want scientists in Africa to invent, they will
relate to promoting human security in the continent especially food and
nutrition security, health security, environmental security, energy
security, cultural security, employment security and quality education.
He will want a cure for Ebola and HIV/AIDS as well as a vaccine for
malaria ascribed to African medical scientists. Having just returned a
few days ago from some Ebola-hit West African countries, I am eager to
read in a few months or years that a laboratory in an African country is
noted as having found a cure for Ebola. Perhaps that country will be
Ethiopia!
As I conclude, if Ali Mazrui were seated in this audience, he would
probably be delighted if, aside from the theme of this address which is
on science, technology and innovation, I make a few statements about a
philosophy he stood for. Ali Mazrui stood for Africa rising like a
Sphynx from the ashes of colonialism. My thoughts align with his about
the danger of globalisation for Africa. Africa has effectively been
marginalised from the globalisation process from the time of slave trade
because institutions have not been part of a convergence economic
governance system. We must watch out for globalisation, unequal
agreements and burdensome terms of borrowing to avoid the debt trap. If
we talk of globalisation, it must be realistic, relevant and it must
mean the same thing to humankind everywhere in the world. There must be
something substantially visible, effective and positively affecting the
life of every citizen of the world. There must be something in it for
everybody. There must be globalist leaders who think globally, plan
globally and act globally. We must work out strategies to ensure that
global programmers substitute national or even regional programmes,
policies and actions. This requires that we urgently formulate relevant
research themes, build institutions, construct or design frameworks and
build new values and discourses on global harmony, programmes and
policies. We must have equitable share in the global decision-making
and global division of labour and production.
Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen, it now remains for me to thank
you for this invitation and to request us all to keep alive the spirit
of Africanism which the person we are remembering today, Professor Ali
Mazrui, held so dearly.
May his soul continue to rest in peace.
Former President Olusegun Obasanjo delivered the above keynote in
Addis Ababa, on February 27, 2015, at the Ethiopian Academy of Sciences
in honour of late Professor Ali Al’Amin Mazrui
Source
Short URL: http://www.osundefender.org/?p=219524
No comments:
Post a Comment