This is E- News Afrika, we are for real. Join us to get the latest news.
The chairman, Senate Committee on Environment and Ecology, Dr. Bukola
Saraki has declared that the Senate President, David Mark betrayed the
APC senators on his decision to go ahead with the confirmation of Musliu
Obanikoro as a minister.
Saraki during an interview with newsmen in Ilorin yesterday claimed that
Mark reneged on an earlier agreement he had with other lawmakers on
the confirmation of Obanikoro.
According to former governor of
Kwara state, senators had during an executive session agreed to defer
the issue of Obanikoro to allow concerned senators particularly in the
APC to reach an amicable solution on the controversies that surrounded
the then nominee.
He said APC senators had arrived the chamber last week with that
agreement in mind and therefore were disappointed that the Senate
president went straight to the confirmation stage for Obanikoro instead
of making room for reviewing the opposition against the nomination.
He defended the decision of his colleagues to walk out on the
confirmation, saying it was an attempt to protest what was considered as
wrong for the sake of posterity.
“Well I think what happened was unfortunate. I believe that, in the
Senate, the National Assembly, there are many courts- the court of the
law and the court of public opinion and we all represent constituencies.
“I believe in a scenario where the three senators, it has always been
the practice, have an objection to the candidate and I believe we are
all there because we represent the people. We are not there on our own.
We must be concerned with that.
“At the same time, I agree that somebody is innocent until proven
guilty. But I believe the right thing the Senate President should have
done is, we should have tarried a bit and we should not rush on the
issue.
“I remember a week ago, after coming out of the executive session, we
agreed then that we only take the first four nominees and that we would
give one week for further consultation and then we would come back and
review. The only person we are reviewing is Senator Obanikoro.
“But when we came in that day, if you notice, I was trying to make him
(Senate President) know that this is not what we agreed on. We agreed
the last time that we would come back and review the situation. So
instead of reviewing the situation, we are now going straight to start
the screening processes which is reneging on what we agreed on.
“Point number two is that it was clear that the House was divided and
the Senate should not be partisan. We should look at the interest of the
country in the decisions we take, not the political party that we
belong. It is clear that there was controversy on this nominee and I
think the right thing to do is we should have stepped it down while
further consultations were done to satisfy those who say that Senator
Obanikoro has done certain thing.
“But by going ahead and disregarding the rule and also the new
development that we saw was also the court case that was initiated where
somebody has taken Senator Obanikoro and Senator Mark to court. Again,
one of our rules, 53 (5) says once there is litigation, it is not for
discussion.
“I even remember at a time most of us wanted to cross over (to APC), it
was this same section that the Senate President came up with and said he
could not discuss it. The excuse he gave us was that he had not been
served. I think a Senator has got up and Senators are honourable people,
a Senator has told all of us that there is a court case.
“I think that should be good enough, in the interest of, again, uniting
the Senate and ensuring that we take collective decisions. We’re not
supposed to take partisan decisions and also the public opinion on this
matter, the best position would have been to defer it.
“One of the issues of our party also especially those from Lagos state
is that the urgency to have him back as Minister, maybe the fear was
that what they did in Ekiti, they want them to do it in Lagos on
election day. I think if they have deferred it till after the election,
brought the issue back again, had further consultations, there might be a
way that would have shown the statesmanship of the senate.
” I think it was not a correct decision to have taken in the kind of
what people expect of Senate. For us in the APC, we have spoken, we are
minority in the Senate but our walking out was to say that, you can take
the decision, let history judge us that we are not part of that
decision, that’s the issue. It is not that we cannot recognise him, once
he’s been confirmed by the Senate, we are bound by that but the record
shows your position on the matter,”Saraki explained.
He also described as futile effort the reported alleged disbursement of
money to the PDP in Kwara state purportedly to woo electorates saying he
had instructed his followers to collect the money and see it as part of
their own share of the national cake.
No comments:
Post a Comment